In a fiery escalation of political rhetoric, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has lashed out at the Indian National Congress following a controversial remark branding External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar as “Sindoor ka Saudagar”. The BJP alleged that the Congress party’s language signals a “pro-Pakistan” sentiment, intensifying an already polarized discourse ahead of the next general el
Congress’ Controversial Remark
The latest political flare-up was triggered by a senior Congress leader’s characterization of S. Jaishankar as “Sindoor ka Saudagar” (merchant of vermilion), an apparent reference to the minister’s recent comments and diplomatic posture, including his remarks on India’s assertive foreign policy. The jibe, perceived by BJP leaders as gendered and derogatory, was interpreted as an attempt to undermine Jaishankar’s credibility and the government’s diplomatic achievements.
BJP’s Retort: A ‘Pro-Pakistan’ Allegation
Responding sharply, BJP spokespersons accused the Congress party of undermining India’s global image and siding with adversarial narratives. BJP leader Gaurav Bhatia said, “This is not just an insult to a Union Minister; it’s an affront to India’s foreign policy. Congress has repeatedly taken stances that are in consonance with Pakistan’s interests. The ‘Sindoor ka Saudagar’ slur reeks of regressive thinking and desperation.”
Jaishankar’s Record Under the Microscope
Dr. S. Jaishankar, a seasoned diplomat turned politician, has been at the helm of India’s external affairs through a tumultuous period marked by the Russia-Ukraine war, rising Indo-China tensions, and strategic rebalancing in the Indo-Pacific. Under his leadership, India has championed a policy of “multi-alignment”, refusing to be boxed into Cold War-era alliances. Critics of the Congress believe that undermining Jaishankar weakens India’s diplomatic edge on the global stage.
Political Motives and Electoral Undertones
Analysts suggest that such incendiary exchanges are part of an evolving pre-election narrative where both parties seek to consolidate their voter bases. With nationalism and foreign policy increasingly central to electoral rhetoric, personal attacks and symbolic jabs are being used to provoke emotional responses from the electorate.
Conclusion:
As the political climate heats up ahead of the 2025 general elections, statements like “Sindoor ka Saudagar” and counter-allegations of being “pro-Pakistan” highlight the combative mood among India’s political class. While such remarks generate headlines and social media traction, they also underscore a deeper issue—the blurring of lines between political critique and national interest. The days ahead are likely to see more such verbal duels as parties prepare to battle for the electorate’s favor.
